Skip to main content

Gujarat verdict will redefine national politics

Gujarat verdict will redefine national politics

By Deepak Parvatiyar

Published in Marathi in Pudhari
http://pudhari.news/news/National/gujarat-assembly-election-2017-analysis/
&
http://newspaper.pudhari.co.in/home.php?edition=Kolhapur&date=-1&pageno=1&pid=PUDHARI_KOL#Article/PUDHARI_KOL_20171217_07_10/221.33333333333334px


As fates of candidates for the 182 assembly seats are now sealed in the electronic voting machines after the end of the final phase of Gujarat elections on December 14, almost all exit polls are showing majority to the Bharatiya Janata Party. As one waits for the result day, December 18, Gujarat elections this time can be summarized as the prestige battle for the BJP, and a matter of survival for the Congress in the political horizon of the country.

So much importance has been attached to Gujarat that the state elections in Himachal Pradesh that coincided with Gujarat, has failed to attract media attention. Exit polls suggest a Congress defeat in Himachal – one of the five states where it is in power at present. However, Gujarat has become crucial because an upset win or for that matter even a close fight there has the potential of  galvanizing Congress workers before the crucial elections in Karnataka, Meghalaya, and Mizoram next year, where it is in power, and thereafter, the 2019 general elections. The reasons are quite understandable:

1. Gujarat is the home state of both Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP president Amit Shah. Even the third most important leader in the union government, Arun Jaitley is a voter in Gujarat. A setback to the party in a state where it has been in power for the last 22 years, could considerably weaken its position in national politics.

2. It was the ‘Gujarat Model’ of governance that Prime Minister Modi extolled and promised to implement in India while campaigning during the last general elections. A defeat in Gujarat would mean the Gujarati people rejecting this model that Modi had so vigorously sold to the nation in 2014 to win the elections for his party and become the Prime Minister.

3. A tough fight here would resurrect the image of the newly anointed president of the Congress Party, Rahul Gandhi, from a weak leader to a fighter.

No doubt the outcome of the Gujarat elections would shape the future political course of the country and given this fact, both the Congress and the BJP had gone all out in Gujarat.

Just consider that more than anything else, the elections in the state became a personal battleground for both Modi and Rahul who led the charge for their respective parties. Their involvement could be gauged by the fact that between October 12 and December 12, Modi covered 32201.1 km for campaigning in Gujarat while Rahul covered 24099.4 km for campaigning in the state. On the last day of campaigning on December 12 alone, these leaders travelled a distance of 2043.6 km and 1894 km respectively.

While the BJP fought anti-incumbency, the Congress had to find its foothold in a state where it had lost its support base over two decades ago and was in the grip of bitter infighting. Just a few months before the elections, its leader Shankarsinh Vaghela, who was the Leader of the Opposition in the Gujarat House then, had quit the party along with seven other MLAs.

As the Congress faced leadership crisis in the state with no CM face around, the BJP raked up the name of Ahmed Patel as a likely Congress CM face, ostensibly to polarize the Hindu voters. What was more curious was Vaghela’s support to some of the BJP leaders against whom his newly floated political outfit did not field any candidate.

With no CM face to project, the Congress’ import of OBC leader Alpesh Thakor, and its support to dalit leader Jignesh Mevani as well as its pact with Patidar leader Hardik Patel made many heads turn. Many saw it as the Congress’s attempts to revive its KHAM (Kshatriya, Harijan, Adivasi and Muslim) theory that had helped the party retain power in the state in the 1980s. Yet the twist in the tale this time was the pact with Hardik – A development which has made many sit and take note of because Hardik belongs to the influential Patel community which has a major say in electoral politics of the BJP in the state. All the three – Alpesh, Jignesh and Hardik represent a young generation of politicians in the state and the election is also a make or break for them too. There is much of resentment even within the Congress party rank over these ‘imported’ leaders.

While on papers the BJP stuck to its Development plank, the Congress largely focused on Patels, farmers and issues pertaining to youths including unemployment.

Considering the intensity of the contest in the state, it was only expected that all the tricks of the trade would be used and it did happen so. Consider the leaked sex video tapes of Hardik or the video clips of Mevani where he purportedly said that if he had two sisters, he would have married one to a Hindu and one to a Muslim.

Both the Congress and the BJP left no stone unturned to be one up on each other -- From the decision of the Cabinet Committee on Parliamentary Affairs to put off the winter session of Parliament till campaigning ended in Gujarat; to the Congress adopting soft-Hindutva to counter the BJP’s Hindutva in communally sensitive Gujarat ; from Rahul visiting temples to Modi violating VIP safety norms by taking off on a seaplane on the Sabarmati river in Ahmedabad to showcase Development. Even Rahul’s religion was questioned after his visit to the Somnath temple!

There were many issues touched upon and targeted as well. Initially the Congress attacked the BJP over the issue of GST and Demonetisation prompting the GST Council headed by finance minister Jaitley, hurrying up to roll out bunch of reliefs to neutralize the Congress’s campaign.

Not surprising therefore that in an era when political campaigning continues to hit new low every day, verbal abuses, invectives and allegations did fly this time too. While Rahul kept on attacking Modi for attacking the former at personal levels, Congress leader Mani Shankar Aiyar breached his brief and call Modi ‘neech’, taking the entire campaign to a new level of mudslinging. Thus an arrow in the BJP’s quiver was Modi’s conspiracy theory about Pakistan trying to pull the BJP down in Gujarat with the help of the Congress party. He went on to name former Prime Minister Dr. Man Mohan Singh and former Vice President Hamid Ansari besides Aiyar, to be the Congress actors in this ploy of Pakistan. The issue is not dead yet.

Last but not the least! This was an election where EVMs became a suspect. The Congress claimed them to be doctored to favour the BJP. A day after all the exit polls predicted a BJP win, the Gujarat state Congress even went on to move the Supreme Court alleging rigging of EVMs but their plea was rejected by the apex court.

The election campaigning this time exposed the inherent caste-division that prevails in Gujarat.
Throughout the BJP regime in the state, it had tried to put it under cover by playing the communal card. The Congress’s attempts to play the caste card by reviving the KHAM however, exposes that Gujarat is no different than Bihar or Uttar Pradesh where caste plays an important role in elections.

Even Modi too got entangled in this caste war when in his election rally in Jasdan in Rajkot district he accused the Congress of conspiring to throw four Patel Chief Ministers out of power in the past. His critics though accused him of misrepresenting the facts. It may be mentioned that so far Gujarat has seen only four Patel CMs -- Babubhai Jashbhai Patel, Chimanbhai Patel, Keshubhai Patel and the first woman CM Anandiben Patel.

The second most crucial aspect was the ever reducing clout of the Muslims in Gujarat politics. While the BJP did not field any Muslim candidate, the Congress too, in an attempt to woo the Hindus through its newly invented soft-Hindutva which made Jaitley term the Congress as a BJP ‘clone’, fielded only five Muslim candidates this time. This was same as in 2012 too when the Congress for the first time, though unsuccessfully, had flirted with the idea of soft-Hindutva in Gujarat. At that time only two Muslims had entered the Gujarat House.

To sum up, it is clear that the Gujarat verdict will redefine the national politics as the final outcome will be as crucial to Modi as it will be to Rahul. Both these leaders’ political prospects hinges on the verdict.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WANTED: A Leader

WANTED: A Leader EDITORIAL NEWS Share on facebook Share on blogger Share on linkedin Share on twitter More Sharing Services 31 WANTED: A Leader June 13, 2012 12:15 PM By Deepak Parvatiyar Do we really have any leader in our country who is above religion, caste, and sectarian politics and yet popular with the masses? Can you name any one name that is acceptable to the majority as a mass leader? My question assumes significance in the wake of what we witnessed last week. First, at the Congress Working Committee meeting the delegates raked up the issue of inaccessible ministers (how can they be leaders if they are inaccessible?) Yet, the most important issue was the lack of unanimity even within the ruling coalition itself over the choice of the next Presidential candidate. Thereafter, the BJP’s Gujarat satrap Narendra Modi delivered a power packed punch to claim the scalp of his little-known-much-discussed and elusive bête noire Sanjay Joshi. (Can Modi ...

Why election manifestos are losing their value and importance in India?

Why election manifestos are losing their value and importance in India? By  Deepak Parvatiyar March 11, 2015 Much ruckus is being made on the coming together of the two diametrically opposite parties, the Jammu and Kashmir People’s Democratic Party and the  Bharatiya Janata Party , to form the government in Jammu and Kashmir. Inarguably they are two uncomfortable allies who in any given circumstances are considered ideologically misfit to join hands lest rule together. The initial jerks in the coalition have already surfaced after the J&K PDP’s mentor and new state chief minister Mufti Mohammed Sayeed arbitrarily decided to release hard-line Kashmiri separatist Masarat Alam from detention, recently. This has put the BJP in the dock and it now cries foul over not being consulted on the issue. The Opposition has even forced adjournments in both the houses of Parliament over the issue demanding an explanation from the BJP-led Union Government. The BJP is ...

Summary of Second Phase of Assam and Bengal polls

Summary of Second Phase of Assam and Bengal polls By Deepak Parvatiyar http://www.elections.in/blog/summary-second-phase-assam-bengal-polls/ April 11, 2016 An FIR was filed against Assam Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi (Congress) under Section 126 of the Representation of People’s Act at the direction of the Election Commission for violating the model code of conduct by holding a press conference in Guwahati during the second phase of polling in the state. The allegations made by Gogoi during the press conference were found unfounded by the Commission which viewed the press conference as an exercise to influence the polling. Voter Turnout in Assam State polls in Assam concluded with 82.02% of 1,04,35,277 voters turning out at the 12,699 polling stations by 5 pm, to seal the fate of 525 candidates in 61 assembly constituencies of the state. The polling percentage was much higher than the 76.05% recorded in these constituencies in 2011 state elections and the 80.21% poll...