Skip to main content

BJP beats anti-incumbency but Rahul salvages honour in Gujarat

Gujarat Poll Verdict Analysis
BJP beats anti-incumbency but Rahul salvages honour in Gujarat 

By Deepak Parvatiyar

Published in Marathi daily Pudhari



In spite of its defeat, the Congress Party has managed to salvage some honour with an improved performance in Gujarat. Its defeat in Himachal Pradesh though will make its rival, the BJP, stand taller – while the Congress succumbed to anti-incumbency in Himachal, the BJP still managed to hold its fort with a comfortable margin in Gujarat to register the sixth straight win in the state.

For the newly anointed Congress president, Rahul Gandhi, it has been his baptism with fire. But despite the loss in Himachal, his efforts in Gujarat have earned him much respect as a tireless worker despite being derided by his opponents.

This has been the best performance by the Congress ever since the BJP annexed power in Gandhinagar in 1995. On Monday morning, when trends had started coming, in fact the Congress had almost given a shock to the BJP by racing ahead of the latter initially. Celebrations too had started at the Gujarat Pradesh Congress Committee but that was short lived. The message from Gujarat for the Congress workers though would be positive and would be expected to motivate them further when the party faces elections in Karnataka and four north-eastern states – Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya and Tripura, next year. Of these five states, Congress rules in Karnataka, Meghalaya and Mizoram and faces a challenging task of retaining these states. Rahul’s real challenge will be in these states where he would be required to provide leadership in face of the anti-incumbency factor as well as a resurgent BJP which now rules in 14 states of the country as against the Congress’ four!

What seems to be more daunting is the fact that more than anything else, the Congress’s improvement in Gujarat seems largely because of the incumbency factor than any of its ploys deployed.

The Congress ploy to leverage the growing clout of the triad of Patel quota leader Hardik Patel, Dalit leader Jignesh Mevani and OBC leader Alpesh Thakor could fetch it success only in limited pockets. The BJP continued to have an upper hand in the tribal seats of South Gujarat and Surat, where Patels had a significant say. However, to an extent in Patel’s backyard in Saurashtra, the Congress has done marginally better in the elections this time, but still in Rajkot district – the nerve centre of Patel politics, the Hardik magic did not work.

While Alpesh, contesting on a Congress ticket, won from Radhanpur, and Jignesh too won as an Independent from Vadgam with the Congress’ support, the shocker has come from within the Congress’ own rank and file. Its top three leaders, Shaktisinh Gohil, Arjun Modhwadia, Siddharth Patel have lost the elections and their defeat requires some introspection by the Congress. Already there was much dissent within the party over the issue of ‘imported’ candidates (read Jignesh and Alpesh).

Even Rahul’s ploy to exploit GST and demonetization in the Commercial hub of Surat, as well as to harp on unemployment (Unemployment rate of 5.3% in Gujarat in terms of share of labour force that is unemployed is higher than the national figure of 4.5%) failed to fetch the desired result as the voters there have still favoured the BJP. Hence, for the new Congress president, Rahul, he still seems to have a long way to go for matching the BJP’s tactical prowess.

Despite facing a visible anti-incumbency in Gujarat, the way the BJP managed to overcome it makes it emerge even more formidable as a party. It also speaks volumes of the political acumen of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP president Amit Shah. Throughout the campaigning period, the duo kept their ear to the ground and did not hesitate from mid-term course correction. For example Modi effectively neutralized the Congress campaign against the GST by relaxing certain GST provisions. Besides, it went all out attacking Rahul for his soft-Hindutva and temple hopping and even called the Congress a BJP ‘clone’ to send signals to the voters that Hindutva was clearly a BJP prerogative and that the Congress was only an impostor.

Keeping with the trend, the BJP has also impressively retained its urban base in Gujarat. However, what would trouble the Modi-Shah duo is that the party could not score much in the rural belt – a constituency that it had ceded to the Congress in the Panchayat elections of 2015. This is a serious concern considering the farmers’ problems across the country now snowballing into a major crisis.

Already Gandhian activist Anna Hazare has announced launching a mass movement from New Delhi’s Ram Leela ground on 23rd March next year to highlight the farmers’ problems. Now the failure of the BJP to influence voters in the rural areas of Gujarat further puts Modi’s Gujarat Model of Governance under scrutiny in rural areas of his own state. As the BJP this time has got lesser seats than 2012 elections in Gujarat, this does reflect on the vulnerability of Modi’s much talked about ‘Gujarat Model’. The earlier the BJP resolves the issue of agrarian crisis, the better it is for the party’s better prospects in the 2019 general elections. As for Rahul, he does have a task in hand to check the BJP juggernaut from rolling on. Gujarat could well be the beginning but can he forget Himachal?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maharashtra Assembly Polls 2014 : Implications of the End of Alliances

Maharashtra Assembly Polls 2014 : Implications of the End of Alliances By  Deepak Parvatiyar September 27, 2014 The time-tested political alliances — Shiv Sena-Bharatiya Janata Party, and the Indian National Congress-Nationalist Congress Party — collapsed like a pack of cards within a matter of hours in Maharashtra on Thursday, the 26th September. On the surface, the reasons seem common for both the break ups – each one of the alliance partners wanted to have a larger share of the pie and wanted to contest more seats than the other in the ensuing state assembly elections. Performances of Allies in 2009 Maharashtra Assembly Polls In the last assembly elections in 2009, the Congress had emerged as the largest party in the 272-member Maharashtra House by winning 82 of the 169 seats that it had contested. Its coalition partner, the NCP, had then won 62 of the 114 seats it had contested then then. You may also like to read Who will be the next Chief Mi...

WANTED: A Leader

WANTED: A Leader EDITORIAL NEWS Share on facebook Share on blogger Share on linkedin Share on twitter More Sharing Services 31 WANTED: A Leader June 13, 2012 12:15 PM By Deepak Parvatiyar Do we really have any leader in our country who is above religion, caste, and sectarian politics and yet popular with the masses? Can you name any one name that is acceptable to the majority as a mass leader? My question assumes significance in the wake of what we witnessed last week. First, at the Congress Working Committee meeting the delegates raked up the issue of inaccessible ministers (how can they be leaders if they are inaccessible?) Yet, the most important issue was the lack of unanimity even within the ruling coalition itself over the choice of the next Presidential candidate. Thereafter, the BJP’s Gujarat satrap Narendra Modi delivered a power packed punch to claim the scalp of his little-known-much-discussed and elusive bête noire Sanjay Joshi. (Can Modi ...

Indian Elections: Hostage to Corrupt Politicians?

Indian Elections: Hostage to Corrupt Politicians By  Deepak Parvatiyar September 18, 2014 We often talk of corruption pervading the electoral system in our country. We rue the criminals entering politics as we point out that 13 cabinet ministers in the present Union government face various charges of corruption. Further, as many as 186 MPs got elected despite facing criminal charges. In desperation, we expect a messiah a la Anna Hazare to stem the rot. Yet, corrupt and criminal elements manage to win elections, because we, the voters, elect them, even though we are fed up with corruption and criminalisation of politics. Do People Patronise Corrupt Politicians? Given a choice, don’t we voters most of the time opt for a benevolent crook who we perceive as a smart go-getter? Don’t we loathe an idealist simply because (s)he tends to go “too much by the book”?   Ask the Reserve Bank of India Governor, Raghuram Rajan! While  delivering a speech at...