Skip to main content

Why did TMC win in West Bengal?



Why did TMC win in West Bengal?
May 20, 2016
- See more at: http://www.elections.in/blog/why-did-tmc-win-in-west-bengal/#sthash.aDh2kCUD.dpuf

Post verdict, Didi summed it all aptly. “If a party loses its ideology, it loses everything. CPI(M)-Congress have lost everything,” said the Trinamool Congress (TMC) boss. But was that so? After all even Mamata Banerjee is known to switch affiliations – from centrist Congress to right wing National Democratic Alliance and so on! In 2011, she was the first to exploit the Congress’s support to oust the Left from power in West Bengal.  This time she termed the Congress as a “creeper…” But isn’t she a hard bargainer who loves to put her finger in every pie?
Mamata has emerged stronger than the last time
Still to the uninitiated, Mamata has emerged stronger than the last time after winning more seats than what it had won in 2011 in West Bengal. In the process, she has not just decimated the Left but also subdued its uncomfortable ally, the Congress.
As in Bihar last year where it was a junior alliance partner of the Janata Dal (United)-Rashtriya Janata Dal-led Grand Alliance, the Congress had thought of a piggy back ride to power by entering into a pact with the Left Front. As it is, the Left Front now sees Red, getting lesser seats than what it had managed last time in the state!
The question thus arises is whether the dilution of ideology alone cost Left dearly this election in socially/ideologically conscious Bengal or was it just that the voters were still yet to forget its “misrule” before Mamata’s TMC had emerged as an alternative in 2011? It though goes beyond dispute that the Left-Congress pact – a first in Bengal politics – was nothing but sheer political opportunism, devoid of any ideology.
It did discredit the Left much as the voters ignored corruption issues involving TMC leaders, be it the Narada sting where a few TMC member of Parliaments were shown on camera accepting cash or the Saradha scam where the ruling party was allegedly involved. Although the TMC lost the Kolkata seat this time, the recent collapse of under-construction flyover outside the city, in which many were killed, had no impact on the party’s electoral fortunes as it conveniently shifted the blame on the CPI-M whose government had launched the project.
The TMC victory proves that voters were more willing to buy Mamata’s development plank than that of the Left. Yet statistics suggest that the anti-incumbency factor worked in the state only twice in the last 39 years – in 1977 and then in 2011 and this implies that the voters of West Bengal are more willing to give the ruling party more than one chance. Still, this was the fourth consecutive time that the TMC thrashed the Left in elections in the state starting with the 2009 Lok Sabha elections and the first time that a party won while contesting alone.
The verdict endorses Mamta’s claims of restoring peace and development in the Naxal hit regions. Besides, winning more seats than before also meant that the Left-Congress alliance could not win over the Muslims as they would have been hoping to amidst reports that Mamata had lost her grip on the Muslim voters because of her government’s apathy towards their agrarian crisis and the absence of minimum support price for their produce.
Does her resounding victory mean that her government remains “government of common people … (which) will never do anything which could become a burden on people”. After all this too was her poll plank to woo the voters!
- See more at: http://www.elections.in/blog/why-did-tmc-win-in-west-bengal/#sthash.aDh2kCUD.dpuf

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

War between Arvind Kejriwal and Najeeb Jung

War between Arvind Kejriwal and Najeeb Jung By  Deepak Parvatiyar May 21, 2015 Rate this post The ongoing public spat between Lieutenant Governor Najeeb Jung and Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal over the control of Delhi administration has exposed the grey areas in governance that require immediate redressal to ensure against any such crisis in the city state of Delhi. The immediate provocation was the appointment of Shakuntala Gamlin as acting Chief Secretary of Delhi by the Lieutenant Governor in spite of Kejriwal’s strong opposition on 15th May this year. This made the Chief Minister cry foul alleging that the LG was “functioning as if there is President’s Rule in the national capital and there is no elected government here” by bypassing the “democratically elected government…(and) issuing instructions to officers”. Much drama unfolded ever since. Both Kejriwal and Jung indulged into public sparring with Kejriwal even dispatching an angry letter to Jun...

Expectations from Chinese President Xi Jinping’s India Visit

Expectations from Chinese President Xi Jinping’s India Visit By  Deepak Parvatiyar September 5, 2014 Much is expected of the ensuing India visit of the Chinese President Xi Jinping both on strategic and economic fronts. Indian Commerce Minister Nirmala Seetharaman visited Beijing at the same time when Prime Minister Narendra Modi was in Japan. India expects Jinping’s visit to pave the way for major Chinese investments in the country, while also hoping China to facilitate Indian IT services exports by removing the barriers. Border dispute between the two countries too are expected to figure in the summit meet. China High on India’s Agenda There is no doubt that China is crucial to the Modi government’s foreign policy. Vice President Hamid Ansari had visited Beijing in June this year (Seetharaman had accompanied Ansari to China then too). At that time both countries had signed a Memorandum of Understanding on facilitating Chinese industrial parks in India...

The Legacy of a Callous Force

BOMBAY MUSINGS Corruption, Inefficiency... The Legacy of a Callous Force By Deepak Parvatiyar (in Bombay) (This column was published in Free Press Journal, Bombay on 8th March, 1993) If one ignores its dubious role during the recent riots, the Bombay police did enjoy a reputation which could make the famous Scotland Yard envy it. But the recent riots and the emergence of a corrupt and partisan police force made one wonder about such an hyped-up image of the city police. And as the chroniclers recorded the latest events for posterity as a blotch on the face of the city police, one was tempted to flip the pages of history to find out whether the city police ever bore a semblance to the other three Ps -- profiteering, puissance and pomposity -- which have unceremoniously remained a hallmark of Indian police. The modern police force in the city traces its origin to the Bhandari Militia, which had been established around 1672 mainly due to the efforts of the the...