Skip to main content

Why did TMC win in West Bengal?



Why did TMC win in West Bengal?
By Deepak Parvatiyar
May 20, 2016
- See more at: http://www.elections.in/blog/why-did-tmc-win-in-west-bengal/#sthash.aDh2kCUD.dpuf

Post verdict, Didi summed it all aptly. “If a party loses its ideology, it loses everything. CPI(M)-Congress have lost everything,” said the Trinamool Congress (TMC) boss. But was that so? After all even Mamata Banerjee is known to switch affiliations – from centrist Congress to right wing National Democratic Alliance and so on! In 2011, she was the first to exploit the Congress’s support to oust the Left from power in West Bengal.  This time she termed the Congress as a “creeper…” But isn’t she a hard bargainer who loves to put her finger in every pie?
Mamata has emerged stronger than the last time
Still to the uninitiated, Mamata has emerged stronger than the last time after winning more seats than what it had won in 2011 in West Bengal. In the process, she has not just decimated the Left but also subdued its uncomfortable ally, the Congress.
As in Bihar last year where it was a junior alliance partner of the Janata Dal (United)-Rashtriya Janata Dal-led Grand Alliance, the Congress had thought of a piggy back ride to power by entering into a pact with the Left Front. As it is, the Left Front now sees Red, getting lesser seats than what it had managed last time in the state!
The question thus arises is whether the dilution of ideology alone cost Left dearly this election in socially/ideologically conscious Bengal or was it just that the voters were still yet to forget its “misrule” before Mamata’s TMC had emerged as an alternative in 2011? It though goes beyond dispute that the Left-Congress pact – a first in Bengal politics – was nothing but sheer political opportunism, devoid of any ideology.
It did discredit the Left much as the voters ignored corruption issues involving TMC leaders, be it the Narada sting where a few TMC member of Parliaments were shown on camera accepting cash or the Saradha scam where the ruling party was allegedly involved. Although the TMC lost the Kolkata seat this time, the recent collapse of under-construction flyover outside the city, in which many were killed, had no impact on the party’s electoral fortunes as it conveniently shifted the blame on the CPI-M whose government had launched the project.
The TMC victory proves that voters were more willing to buy Mamata’s development plank than that of the Left. Yet statistics suggest that the anti-incumbency factor worked in the state only twice in the last 39 years – in 1977 and then in 2011 and this implies that the voters of West Bengal are more willing to give the ruling party more than one chance. Still, this was the fourth consecutive time that the TMC thrashed the Left in elections in the state starting with the 2009 Lok Sabha elections and the first time that a party won while contesting alone.
The verdict endorses Mamta’s claims of restoring peace and development in the Naxal hit regions. Besides, winning more seats than before also meant that the Left-Congress alliance could not win over the Muslims as they would have been hoping to amidst reports that Mamata had lost her grip on the Muslim voters because of her government’s apathy towards their agrarian crisis and the absence of minimum support price for their produce.
Does her resounding victory mean that her government remains “government of common people … (which) will never do anything which could become a burden on people”. After all this too was her poll plank to woo the voters!
- See more at: http://www.elections.in/blog/why-did-tmc-win-in-west-bengal/#sthash.aDh2kCUD.dpuf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maharashtra Assembly Polls 2014 : Implications of the End of Alliances

Maharashtra Assembly Polls 2014 : Implications of the End of Alliances By  Deepak Parvatiyar September 27, 2014 The time-tested political alliances — Shiv Sena-Bharatiya Janata Party, and the Indian National Congress-Nationalist Congress Party — collapsed like a pack of cards within a matter of hours in Maharashtra on Thursday, the 26th September. On the surface, the reasons seem common for both the break ups – each one of the alliance partners wanted to have a larger share of the pie and wanted to contest more seats than the other in the ensuing state assembly elections. Performances of Allies in 2009 Maharashtra Assembly Polls In the last assembly elections in 2009, the Congress had emerged as the largest party in the 272-member Maharashtra House by winning 82 of the 169 seats that it had contested. Its coalition partner, the NCP, had then won 62 of the 114 seats it had contested then then. You may also like to read Who will be the next Chief Mi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Indian Elections: Hostage to Corrupt Politicians?

Indian Elections: Hostage to Corrupt Politicians By  Deepak Parvatiyar September 18, 2014 We often talk of corruption pervading the electoral system in our country. We rue the criminals entering politics as we point out that 13 cabinet ministers in the present Union government face various charges of corruption. Further, as many as 186 MPs got elected despite facing criminal charges. In desperation, we expect a messiah a la Anna Hazare to stem the rot. Yet, corrupt and criminal elements manage to win elections, because we, the voters, elect them, even though we are fed up with corruption and criminalisation of politics. Do People Patronise Corrupt Politicians? Given a choice, don’t we voters most of the time opt for a benevolent crook who we perceive as a smart go-getter? Don’t we loathe an idealist simply because (s)he tends to go “too much by the book”?   Ask the Reserve Bank of India Governor, Raghuram Rajan! While  delivering a speech at...
Post a Comment
Read more

WANTED: A Leader

WANTED: A Leader EDITORIAL NEWS Share on facebook Share on blogger Share on linkedin Share on twitter More Sharing Services 31 WANTED: A Leader June 13, 2012 12:15 PM By Deepak Parvatiyar Do we really have any leader in our country who is above religion, caste, and sectarian politics and yet popular with the masses? Can you name any one name that is acceptable to the majority as a mass leader? My question assumes significance in the wake of what we witnessed last week. First, at the Congress Working Committee meeting the delegates raked up the issue of inaccessible ministers (how can they be leaders if they are inaccessible?) Yet, the most important issue was the lack of unanimity even within the ruling coalition itself over the choice of the next Presidential candidate. Thereafter, the BJP’s Gujarat satrap Narendra Modi delivered a power packed punch to claim the scalp of his little-known-much-discussed and elusive bête noire Sanjay Joshi. (Can Modi ...
Post a Comment
Read more