Skip to main content

What explains BJP’s performance in 2016 Assembly elections



What explains BJP’s performance in 2016 Assembly elections

Published in 

http://www.elections.in/blog/what-explains-bjp-performance-in-2016-assembly-elections/

May 26, 2016
Following his party’s better show in recent elections in Assam, West Bengal, Kerala,Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, the BJP president Amit Shah, who till recently was struggling to explain the party’s debacles in Bihar and Delhi, attributed it to the voters’ approval of Modi government’s “pro-poor, pro-farmers and pro-village work”.
Obviously, the BJP’s vote share increased in all these five states. This enabled the party to form its first ever government in Assam and open its account in Kerala assembly for the first ever time, what if just by a solitary win.
What led to Enhanced Performance by the BJP?
The question being debated is whether it was Modi’s policies or other factors, including the decline in the Congress’s popularity, that contributed to an enhanced performance by the BJP.
Undoubtedly, the BJP, with a neat strategy to enter into an alliance with influential regional parties Asom Gana Parishad (AGP) and Bodoland People’s Front (BPF), exploited the perceived anti-incumbency factor against the 15-year-old Congress government to romp home in Assam. In the process, it showed its ability to learn from the Bihar defeat, as unlike in Bihar, it stuck to highlighting its own governance agenda than going overboard to criticise the incumbent government. Its vote share in the state, too, jumped significantly from 11.5% in 2011 to 29.5% in 2016. Yet, it was considerably less if compared to 36.5% vote share that it had got in the 2014 Lok Sabha elections.
One may argue that Lok Sabha election is a different ball game altogether where local issues give way to national issues. Still, judging by the same yardstick, the Congress’s vote share, despite its loss, did not drop drastically. In fact, despite being a loser this time, its vote share at 31% was higher than that of the BJP’s. The reason could be that the party contested more seats than the BJP as the latter had seat-sharing arrangements with its junior allies too. Yet, the Congress’ vote share percentage was actually an improvement from 29.9% in 2014 Lok Sabha performance as compared with 39.9% in 2011 Assembly elections!
BJP-Congress Performance Comparison in Four States
In a direct comparison with the Congress in the remaining four states, the BJP did improve its position marginally in these states, but even the Congress improved its seat share in West Bengal, Tamil Nadu and Puducherry.
In West Bengal, where the BJP had failed to open its account in 2011 but had later won twice in by-polls, the saffron brigade won three seats this time. In the process, the party got around 56 lakh votes – a significant jump from 19.5 lakh votes in 2011. Even the Congress’ performance improved in Bengal as it got 12.3% votes and won 44 seats. This was much higher than its vote share of 9.09% in 2011 when it had won 42 seats, but much less than the 17.5% vote share in 2014 Lok Sabha elections.
Obviously, the Modi government’s performance, as Shah had claimed, had no impact whatsoever on either the ruling Trinamool Congress’ performance or the Congress. The TMC improved its tally from 184 seats in 2011 (38.93% vote share) to 211 seats in 2016 (an improvement in vote share by 5.6 per cent). In fact, it was the Left Front that lost the space perhaps for diluting its ideology to befriend its arch rival, the Congress before the polls in the state.
The Congress’s performance in Tamil Nadu, too, was interesting as despite a drop in its vote share percentage – from 9.30% in 2011 to 6.4% in 2016 – it could win more seats (8) than what it had won in 2011(5 seats). In contrast, in Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, the vote share did go up for the BJP in spite of its failure to win a single seat.
Is Congress still a force to reckon with?
Verdicts in Assam, Tamil Nadu and Puducherry proved that there is not much correlation between the vote share and seats won. Many analysts also cite statistics to prove that the Congress still remains a force to reckon with despite its negative projection in the media. In these five states, the Congress had contested 363 seats which was almost half of the 696 seats that the BJP had contested. Still, the former had won 115 of these seats as against the BJP’s 64. In terms of success rate, the Congress’s success rate was an impressive 31.6% while the BJP’s was 9.1%.
Yet, in terms of popular support, the indices did show that the BJP made significant inroads in these states while the Congress’s support base got eroded in three of these five states.
Not much was expected of it in Tamil Nadu though, where like the BJP, it remains a junior party. However, this erosion of vote share did prove decisive for the Congress in Assam as well as Kerala where the party lost the seat of power.
BJP Gains Inroads into Kerala
Coming to Kerala, the BJP’s graph in the state is on ascendance. From just 4.75% vote share in 2006 to 6.03% in 2011, its vote share percentage reached double digits to 10.5% in 2016. In comparison, the Congress’ graph, which was on a rise (24.09% vote share in 2006 that rose to 26.4% in 2011), declined to 23.7% in 2016. Yet, what is interesting is that of the seven seats where the BJP emerged as runner-up in the state, it replaced the Congress only at two constituencies – Chathannur and Malampuzha. The saffron party’s influence at Kazhakoottam constituency, where the CPI-M defeated the sitting Congress MLA, could not be discounted as the Congress came a distant third behind the CPI-M and the BJP this time. Incidentally, the only seat that the BJP could win for the first time ever in Kerala, the party defeated not the Congress but the CPI-M!
In the final analysis, what could not be ignored is that none of these five states were BJP strongholds in the past. Yet, a victory in Assam was along the predicted lines and the BJP did not disappoint the psephologists here. To the credit of the Congress, it did improve its seat tally in West Bengal and returned to power in rather insignificant Puducherry (where the BJP has little base). This means, despite being down, the Congress remains a force and in spite of being in power, whether alone or with its allies, in 13 states, the BJP does have a Herculean task ahead to fulfill its dream of a ‘Congress-free India”. If the BJP fails, it will be good for democracy, certainly!
Post Script: After losing Kerala and Assam, the Congress now rules only six states with just one big state, Karnataka in this list! Not a mean achievement for Modi and the BJP though!
- See more at: http://www.elections.in/blog/what-explains-bjp-performance-in-2016-assembly-elections/#sthash.AEGUTgEk.dpuf

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

War between Arvind Kejriwal and Najeeb Jung

War between Arvind Kejriwal and Najeeb Jung By  Deepak Parvatiyar May 21, 2015 Rate this post The ongoing public spat between Lieutenant Governor Najeeb Jung and Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal over the control of Delhi administration has exposed the grey areas in governance that require immediate redressal to ensure against any such crisis in the city state of Delhi. The immediate provocation was the appointment of Shakuntala Gamlin as acting Chief Secretary of Delhi by the Lieutenant Governor in spite of Kejriwal’s strong opposition on 15th May this year. This made the Chief Minister cry foul alleging that the LG was “functioning as if there is President’s Rule in the national capital and there is no elected government here” by bypassing the “democratically elected government…(and) issuing instructions to officers”. Much drama unfolded ever since. Both Kejriwal and Jung indulged into public sparring with Kejriwal even dispatching an angry letter to Jun...

Expectations from Chinese President Xi Jinping’s India Visit

Expectations from Chinese President Xi Jinping’s India Visit By  Deepak Parvatiyar September 5, 2014 Much is expected of the ensuing India visit of the Chinese President Xi Jinping both on strategic and economic fronts. Indian Commerce Minister Nirmala Seetharaman visited Beijing at the same time when Prime Minister Narendra Modi was in Japan. India expects Jinping’s visit to pave the way for major Chinese investments in the country, while also hoping China to facilitate Indian IT services exports by removing the barriers. Border dispute between the two countries too are expected to figure in the summit meet. China High on India’s Agenda There is no doubt that China is crucial to the Modi government’s foreign policy. Vice President Hamid Ansari had visited Beijing in June this year (Seetharaman had accompanied Ansari to China then too). At that time both countries had signed a Memorandum of Understanding on facilitating Chinese industrial parks in India...

The Legacy of a Callous Force

BOMBAY MUSINGS Corruption, Inefficiency... The Legacy of a Callous Force By Deepak Parvatiyar (in Bombay) (This column was published in Free Press Journal, Bombay on 8th March, 1993) If one ignores its dubious role during the recent riots, the Bombay police did enjoy a reputation which could make the famous Scotland Yard envy it. But the recent riots and the emergence of a corrupt and partisan police force made one wonder about such an hyped-up image of the city police. And as the chroniclers recorded the latest events for posterity as a blotch on the face of the city police, one was tempted to flip the pages of history to find out whether the city police ever bore a semblance to the other three Ps -- profiteering, puissance and pomposity -- which have unceremoniously remained a hallmark of Indian police. The modern police force in the city traces its origin to the Bhandari Militia, which had been established around 1672 mainly due to the efforts of the the...