Skip to main content

Quick take on the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act of 1958

The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958

Posted by Deepak Parvatiyar on March 1, 2015 | Comment
States such as Manipur and Jammu and Kashmir have for long been demanding the withdrawal of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958. Only recently, the issue of revocation of the Act came in the way of a likely alliance between the Jammu and Kashmir People’s Democratic Party and the Bharatiya Janata Party to form the government in Jammu and Kashmir. What compounded the matter was the Army’s reported apprehension over any move to dilute the AFSPA in the state and the BJP’s concerns that any such move might lead to “lowering of the morale of forces operating” in Jammu and Kashmir. 
The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act
While some sort of understanding has now been made between the two political parties that paves the way for the process of government formation in the state after a stalemate of two months, this brings the focus on the AFSPA – a legislation that has much been demonized by civil society groups, political parties and media as well in recent times. 

What is AFSPA? 

The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) dates back to 11 September 1958, when it received the assent of the President after both the Houses of Parliament of India had passed the Act. It was enacted to provide certain special powers to the armed forces in “disturbed areas” where the armed forces were deemed necessary to aid the civil power. 
The Act provides more power to the armed forces in “disturbed areas” and was first introduced in the states of Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Nagaland, Tripura and (the then Union Territories) Arunachal Pradesh and Mizoram. It was extended to Jammu and Kashmir as the Armed Forces (Jammu and Kashmir) Special Powers Act, in July 1990. 
In relation to any state or Union Territory to which this Act extends, it empowers the Governor, the Administrator, or the Central Government to declare the whole or part of the state or Union Territory as disturbed area vide a notification in the official Gazette, so as to allow the armed forces to aid the civil power in controlling the situation. 
However, the Governor or administrator, despite being empowered by the Act to declare any area of the State as “disturbed area’, cannot take arbitrary decisions “on ground of absence of legislative guidelines” (Inderjit Barua vs. State of Assam, AIR 1983, Del. 514). This means the AFSPA can be applied only after an area is declared a ‘disturbed area’ by the State/Centre. 

Special Provisions to the Armed Forces as bestowed by the Act 

The Act empowers any warrant officer, commissioned or non-commissioned officer, or any other person of equivalent rank in the armed forces to open fire after giving due warning, “even to the extent of causing death…,” so as to maintain public order in a disturbed area. 
As per the Act, it is within the discretion of the army officer to destroy: 
  • Any arms dump
  • Prepared or fortified position or shelter from which armed attacks are made or are likely to be made or attempted to be made”
  •  Any structure used either as a training camp, hideout by wanted armed gangs or absconders
The Act also gives unrestricted power to the army officer to search any premise or arrest anyone without warrant even by using force, on the basis of “a reasonable suspicion” that the person had either committed or was “about to commit a cognizable offence”.
The Act provides that the arrested person should be handed over to the police at the nearest police station “with the least possible delay” along with a report of the circumstances occasioning the arrest. 
However, the Act provides legal immunity to the army officer for his actions. There can be no prosecution, suit or any other legal proceeding against anyone acting under that law. Nor is the government’s judgment on why an area is found to be disturbed subject to judicial review.
He cannot be prosecuted and no suit or other legal proceeding can be instituted against him “except with the previous sanction of the Central Government”.
List of amending acts 
1. The State of Mizoram Act, 1986 (34 of 1986).
2. The State of Arunachal Pradesh Act, 1986 (69 of 1986). 
3. The Armed Forces (Assam and Manipur) Special Powers (Amendment).  Act, 1972 (7 of 1972).
 4. The Armed Forces Special Powers (Extension to Union Territory of Tripura) Act, 1970.
 5. The Repealing and Amending Act, 1960 (58 of 1960).

 History of AFSPA

 Prior to the AFSPA, an Armed Forces (Assam and Manipur) Special Powers Ordinance was promulgated by the President on 22 May 1958 to check increasing violence in the northeastern states. Thereafter the Ordinance was replaced by the Armed Forces Special Powers Bill. 
In British India too, an ordinance by the same name– The Armed Forces Special Powers Ordinance of 1942 — was introduced on 15 August 1942 which was aimed at suppressing the Quit India Movement. Thereafter four ordinances – the Assam Disturbed Areas (Special Powers of Armed Forces) Ordinance; the Bengal Disturbed Areas (Special Powers of Armed Forces) Ordinance; East Bengal Disturbed Areas (Special Powers of Armed Forces) Ordinance; the United provinces Disturbed Areas (Special Powers of Armed Forces) Ordinance – were modeled on the British ordinance to deal with the alarming internal security situation in the country in 1947 after the Partition.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

War between Arvind Kejriwal and Najeeb Jung

War between Arvind Kejriwal and Najeeb Jung By  Deepak Parvatiyar May 21, 2015 Rate this post The ongoing public spat between Lieutenant Governor Najeeb Jung and Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal over the control of Delhi administration has exposed the grey areas in governance that require immediate redressal to ensure against any such crisis in the city state of Delhi. The immediate provocation was the appointment of Shakuntala Gamlin as acting Chief Secretary of Delhi by the Lieutenant Governor in spite of Kejriwal’s strong opposition on 15th May this year. This made the Chief Minister cry foul alleging that the LG was “functioning as if there is President’s Rule in the national capital and there is no elected government here” by bypassing the “democratically elected government…(and) issuing instructions to officers”. Much drama unfolded ever since. Both Kejriwal and Jung indulged into public sparring with Kejriwal even dispatching an angry letter to Jun...

Is this the End of Dynastic Politics in India?

Is this the End of Dynastic Politics in India? By  Deepak Parvatiyar July 30, 2014 Why are we so eager to write the epitaph of dynastic rule just because the Congress lost the elections this time? Didn’t the torch bearers of India’s foremost political dynasty – the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty, who contested the elections, actually won? Whether it was Sonia Gandhi, her son Rahul (both Congress), Maneka Gandhi and her son Varun (both BJP) all of them tasted victory at the hustings. Can Dynasties be Devoid of Conflicting Ideologies? I have another poser. It may be a wild assumption but suppose Varun rises in the BJP to become the prime minister of the country, would we call him carrying the legacy of a Nehru or a Gandhi? Would we make a distinction because of the ideological differences between Nehru’s centrist and Varun’s right wing politics? Yet there are instances in Indian politics where fathers (even mothers) and sons (and daughters alike) have nurtured poli...

Expectations from Chinese President Xi Jinping’s India Visit

Expectations from Chinese President Xi Jinping’s India Visit By  Deepak Parvatiyar September 5, 2014 Much is expected of the ensuing India visit of the Chinese President Xi Jinping both on strategic and economic fronts. Indian Commerce Minister Nirmala Seetharaman visited Beijing at the same time when Prime Minister Narendra Modi was in Japan. India expects Jinping’s visit to pave the way for major Chinese investments in the country, while also hoping China to facilitate Indian IT services exports by removing the barriers. Border dispute between the two countries too are expected to figure in the summit meet. China High on India’s Agenda There is no doubt that China is crucial to the Modi government’s foreign policy. Vice President Hamid Ansari had visited Beijing in June this year (Seetharaman had accompanied Ansari to China then too). At that time both countries had signed a Memorandum of Understanding on facilitating Chinese industrial parks in India...