Skip to main content

Quick take on the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act of 1958

The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958

Posted by Deepak Parvatiyar on March 1, 2015 | Comment
States such as Manipur and Jammu and Kashmir have for long been demanding the withdrawal of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958. Only recently, the issue of revocation of the Act came in the way of a likely alliance between the Jammu and Kashmir People’s Democratic Party and the Bharatiya Janata Party to form the government in Jammu and Kashmir. What compounded the matter was the Army’s reported apprehension over any move to dilute the AFSPA in the state and the BJP’s concerns that any such move might lead to “lowering of the morale of forces operating” in Jammu and Kashmir. 
The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act
While some sort of understanding has now been made between the two political parties that paves the way for the process of government formation in the state after a stalemate of two months, this brings the focus on the AFSPA – a legislation that has much been demonized by civil society groups, political parties and media as well in recent times. 

What is AFSPA? 

The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) dates back to 11 September 1958, when it received the assent of the President after both the Houses of Parliament of India had passed the Act. It was enacted to provide certain special powers to the armed forces in “disturbed areas” where the armed forces were deemed necessary to aid the civil power. 
The Act provides more power to the armed forces in “disturbed areas” and was first introduced in the states of Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Nagaland, Tripura and (the then Union Territories) Arunachal Pradesh and Mizoram. It was extended to Jammu and Kashmir as the Armed Forces (Jammu and Kashmir) Special Powers Act, in July 1990. 
In relation to any state or Union Territory to which this Act extends, it empowers the Governor, the Administrator, or the Central Government to declare the whole or part of the state or Union Territory as disturbed area vide a notification in the official Gazette, so as to allow the armed forces to aid the civil power in controlling the situation. 
However, the Governor or administrator, despite being empowered by the Act to declare any area of the State as “disturbed area’, cannot take arbitrary decisions “on ground of absence of legislative guidelines” (Inderjit Barua vs. State of Assam, AIR 1983, Del. 514). This means the AFSPA can be applied only after an area is declared a ‘disturbed area’ by the State/Centre. 

Special Provisions to the Armed Forces as bestowed by the Act 

The Act empowers any warrant officer, commissioned or non-commissioned officer, or any other person of equivalent rank in the armed forces to open fire after giving due warning, “even to the extent of causing death…,” so as to maintain public order in a disturbed area. 
As per the Act, it is within the discretion of the army officer to destroy: 
  • Any arms dump
  • Prepared or fortified position or shelter from which armed attacks are made or are likely to be made or attempted to be made”
  •  Any structure used either as a training camp, hideout by wanted armed gangs or absconders
The Act also gives unrestricted power to the army officer to search any premise or arrest anyone without warrant even by using force, on the basis of “a reasonable suspicion” that the person had either committed or was “about to commit a cognizable offence”.
The Act provides that the arrested person should be handed over to the police at the nearest police station “with the least possible delay” along with a report of the circumstances occasioning the arrest. 
However, the Act provides legal immunity to the army officer for his actions. There can be no prosecution, suit or any other legal proceeding against anyone acting under that law. Nor is the government’s judgment on why an area is found to be disturbed subject to judicial review.
He cannot be prosecuted and no suit or other legal proceeding can be instituted against him “except with the previous sanction of the Central Government”.
List of amending acts 
1. The State of Mizoram Act, 1986 (34 of 1986).
2. The State of Arunachal Pradesh Act, 1986 (69 of 1986). 
3. The Armed Forces (Assam and Manipur) Special Powers (Amendment).  Act, 1972 (7 of 1972).
 4. The Armed Forces Special Powers (Extension to Union Territory of Tripura) Act, 1970.
 5. The Repealing and Amending Act, 1960 (58 of 1960).

 History of AFSPA

 Prior to the AFSPA, an Armed Forces (Assam and Manipur) Special Powers Ordinance was promulgated by the President on 22 May 1958 to check increasing violence in the northeastern states. Thereafter the Ordinance was replaced by the Armed Forces Special Powers Bill. 
In British India too, an ordinance by the same name– The Armed Forces Special Powers Ordinance of 1942 — was introduced on 15 August 1942 which was aimed at suppressing the Quit India Movement. Thereafter four ordinances – the Assam Disturbed Areas (Special Powers of Armed Forces) Ordinance; the Bengal Disturbed Areas (Special Powers of Armed Forces) Ordinance; East Bengal Disturbed Areas (Special Powers of Armed Forces) Ordinance; the United provinces Disturbed Areas (Special Powers of Armed Forces) Ordinance – were modeled on the British ordinance to deal with the alarming internal security situation in the country in 1947 after the Partition.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WANTED: A Leader

WANTED: A Leader EDITORIAL NEWS Share on facebook Share on blogger Share on linkedin Share on twitter More Sharing Services 31 WANTED: A Leader June 13, 2012 12:15 PM By Deepak Parvatiyar Do we really have any leader in our country who is above religion, caste, and sectarian politics and yet popular with the masses? Can you name any one name that is acceptable to the majority as a mass leader? My question assumes significance in the wake of what we witnessed last week. First, at the Congress Working Committee meeting the delegates raked up the issue of inaccessible ministers (how can they be leaders if they are inaccessible?) Yet, the most important issue was the lack of unanimity even within the ruling coalition itself over the choice of the next Presidential candidate. Thereafter, the BJP’s Gujarat satrap Narendra Modi delivered a power packed punch to claim the scalp of his little-known-much-discussed and elusive bête noire Sanjay Joshi. (Can Modi ...

Indian Elections: Hostage to Corrupt Politicians?

Indian Elections: Hostage to Corrupt Politicians By  Deepak Parvatiyar September 18, 2014 We often talk of corruption pervading the electoral system in our country. We rue the criminals entering politics as we point out that 13 cabinet ministers in the present Union government face various charges of corruption. Further, as many as 186 MPs got elected despite facing criminal charges. In desperation, we expect a messiah a la Anna Hazare to stem the rot. Yet, corrupt and criminal elements manage to win elections, because we, the voters, elect them, even though we are fed up with corruption and criminalisation of politics. Do People Patronise Corrupt Politicians? Given a choice, don’t we voters most of the time opt for a benevolent crook who we perceive as a smart go-getter? Don’t we loathe an idealist simply because (s)he tends to go “too much by the book”?   Ask the Reserve Bank of India Governor, Raghuram Rajan! While  delivering a speech at...

Maharashtra Assembly Polls 2014 : Implications of the End of Alliances

Maharashtra Assembly Polls 2014 : Implications of the End of Alliances By  Deepak Parvatiyar September 27, 2014 The time-tested political alliances — Shiv Sena-Bharatiya Janata Party, and the Indian National Congress-Nationalist Congress Party — collapsed like a pack of cards within a matter of hours in Maharashtra on Thursday, the 26th September. On the surface, the reasons seem common for both the break ups – each one of the alliance partners wanted to have a larger share of the pie and wanted to contest more seats than the other in the ensuing state assembly elections. Performances of Allies in 2009 Maharashtra Assembly Polls In the last assembly elections in 2009, the Congress had emerged as the largest party in the 272-member Maharashtra House by winning 82 of the 169 seats that it had contested. Its coalition partner, the NCP, had then won 62 of the 114 seats it had contested then then. You may also like to read Who will be the next Chief Mi...