Skip to main content

Quick take on the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act of 1958

The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958

Posted by Deepak Parvatiyar on March 1, 2015 | Comment
States such as Manipur and Jammu and Kashmir have for long been demanding the withdrawal of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958. Only recently, the issue of revocation of the Act came in the way of a likely alliance between the Jammu and Kashmir People’s Democratic Party and the Bharatiya Janata Party to form the government in Jammu and Kashmir. What compounded the matter was the Army’s reported apprehension over any move to dilute the AFSPA in the state and the BJP’s concerns that any such move might lead to “lowering of the morale of forces operating” in Jammu and Kashmir. 
The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act
While some sort of understanding has now been made between the two political parties that paves the way for the process of government formation in the state after a stalemate of two months, this brings the focus on the AFSPA – a legislation that has much been demonized by civil society groups, political parties and media as well in recent times. 

What is AFSPA? 

The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) dates back to 11 September 1958, when it received the assent of the President after both the Houses of Parliament of India had passed the Act. It was enacted to provide certain special powers to the armed forces in “disturbed areas” where the armed forces were deemed necessary to aid the civil power. 
The Act provides more power to the armed forces in “disturbed areas” and was first introduced in the states of Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Nagaland, Tripura and (the then Union Territories) Arunachal Pradesh and Mizoram. It was extended to Jammu and Kashmir as the Armed Forces (Jammu and Kashmir) Special Powers Act, in July 1990. 
In relation to any state or Union Territory to which this Act extends, it empowers the Governor, the Administrator, or the Central Government to declare the whole or part of the state or Union Territory as disturbed area vide a notification in the official Gazette, so as to allow the armed forces to aid the civil power in controlling the situation. 
However, the Governor or administrator, despite being empowered by the Act to declare any area of the State as “disturbed area’, cannot take arbitrary decisions “on ground of absence of legislative guidelines” (Inderjit Barua vs. State of Assam, AIR 1983, Del. 514). This means the AFSPA can be applied only after an area is declared a ‘disturbed area’ by the State/Centre. 

Special Provisions to the Armed Forces as bestowed by the Act 

The Act empowers any warrant officer, commissioned or non-commissioned officer, or any other person of equivalent rank in the armed forces to open fire after giving due warning, “even to the extent of causing death…,” so as to maintain public order in a disturbed area. 
As per the Act, it is within the discretion of the army officer to destroy: 
  • Any arms dump
  • Prepared or fortified position or shelter from which armed attacks are made or are likely to be made or attempted to be made”
  •  Any structure used either as a training camp, hideout by wanted armed gangs or absconders
The Act also gives unrestricted power to the army officer to search any premise or arrest anyone without warrant even by using force, on the basis of “a reasonable suspicion” that the person had either committed or was “about to commit a cognizable offence”.
The Act provides that the arrested person should be handed over to the police at the nearest police station “with the least possible delay” along with a report of the circumstances occasioning the arrest. 
However, the Act provides legal immunity to the army officer for his actions. There can be no prosecution, suit or any other legal proceeding against anyone acting under that law. Nor is the government’s judgment on why an area is found to be disturbed subject to judicial review.
He cannot be prosecuted and no suit or other legal proceeding can be instituted against him “except with the previous sanction of the Central Government”.
List of amending acts 
1. The State of Mizoram Act, 1986 (34 of 1986).
2. The State of Arunachal Pradesh Act, 1986 (69 of 1986). 
3. The Armed Forces (Assam and Manipur) Special Powers (Amendment).  Act, 1972 (7 of 1972).
 4. The Armed Forces Special Powers (Extension to Union Territory of Tripura) Act, 1970.
 5. The Repealing and Amending Act, 1960 (58 of 1960).

 History of AFSPA

 Prior to the AFSPA, an Armed Forces (Assam and Manipur) Special Powers Ordinance was promulgated by the President on 22 May 1958 to check increasing violence in the northeastern states. Thereafter the Ordinance was replaced by the Armed Forces Special Powers Bill. 
In British India too, an ordinance by the same name– The Armed Forces Special Powers Ordinance of 1942 — was introduced on 15 August 1942 which was aimed at suppressing the Quit India Movement. Thereafter four ordinances – the Assam Disturbed Areas (Special Powers of Armed Forces) Ordinance; the Bengal Disturbed Areas (Special Powers of Armed Forces) Ordinance; East Bengal Disturbed Areas (Special Powers of Armed Forces) Ordinance; the United provinces Disturbed Areas (Special Powers of Armed Forces) Ordinance – were modeled on the British ordinance to deal with the alarming internal security situation in the country in 1947 after the Partition.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WANTED: A Leader

WANTED: A Leader EDITORIAL NEWS Share on facebook Share on blogger Share on linkedin Share on twitter More Sharing Services 31 WANTED: A Leader June 13, 2012 12:15 PM By Deepak Parvatiyar Do we really have any leader in our country who is above religion, caste, and sectarian politics and yet popular with the masses? Can you name any one name that is acceptable to the majority as a mass leader? My question assumes significance in the wake of what we witnessed last week. First, at the Congress Working Committee meeting the delegates raked up the issue of inaccessible ministers (how can they be leaders if they are inaccessible?) Yet, the most important issue was the lack of unanimity even within the ruling coalition itself over the choice of the next Presidential candidate. Thereafter, the BJP’s Gujarat satrap Narendra Modi delivered a power packed punch to claim the scalp of his little-known-much-discussed and elusive bête noire Sanjay Joshi. (Can Modi ...

Why election manifestos are losing their value and importance in India?

Why election manifestos are losing their value and importance in India? By  Deepak Parvatiyar March 11, 2015 Much ruckus is being made on the coming together of the two diametrically opposite parties, the Jammu and Kashmir People’s Democratic Party and the  Bharatiya Janata Party , to form the government in Jammu and Kashmir. Inarguably they are two uncomfortable allies who in any given circumstances are considered ideologically misfit to join hands lest rule together. The initial jerks in the coalition have already surfaced after the J&K PDP’s mentor and new state chief minister Mufti Mohammed Sayeed arbitrarily decided to release hard-line Kashmiri separatist Masarat Alam from detention, recently. This has put the BJP in the dock and it now cries foul over not being consulted on the issue. The Opposition has even forced adjournments in both the houses of Parliament over the issue demanding an explanation from the BJP-led Union Government. The BJP is ...

Summary of Second Phase of Assam and Bengal polls

Summary of Second Phase of Assam and Bengal polls By Deepak Parvatiyar http://www.elections.in/blog/summary-second-phase-assam-bengal-polls/ April 11, 2016 An FIR was filed against Assam Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi (Congress) under Section 126 of the Representation of People’s Act at the direction of the Election Commission for violating the model code of conduct by holding a press conference in Guwahati during the second phase of polling in the state. The allegations made by Gogoi during the press conference were found unfounded by the Commission which viewed the press conference as an exercise to influence the polling. Voter Turnout in Assam State polls in Assam concluded with 82.02% of 1,04,35,277 voters turning out at the 12,699 polling stations by 5 pm, to seal the fate of 525 candidates in 61 assembly constituencies of the state. The polling percentage was much higher than the 76.05% recorded in these constituencies in 2011 state elections and the 80.21% poll...