Skip to main content

Tibetans : From Refugees to Voters

Tibetans : From Refugees to Voters

December 23, 2014
Tibetan refugees who were born in India between January 26, 1950 and July 1, 1987 now enjoy the right to vote for the ensuing Delhi Assembly elections as per a December 8 order of the Election Commission of India to Delhi’s Chief Electoral Officer. Other states too will soon follow the line once the electoral rolls are revised.
Tibetans From Refugees to Voters
The decision does not have the government’s consent but is legally valid as India’s citizenship law is very clear that the people born in India before July 1, 1987 and their children are citizens by birth.

Tibetans’ Right to Indian Citizenship Upheld by Courts

The issue of citizenship to Tibetan refugees though came into prominence following judgements on the issue of refugee status of Tibetans born in India between the stipulated period, in two separate yet identical cases respectively by the High Courts of Delhi in December 2010, and Karnataka in August 2013.  Both the High court rulings upheld the Tibetan petitioners’ right to an Indian passport as per the provisions under the country’s Citizenship Act, 1955.
The landmark judgments had much larger ramifications. They implied that the Tibetan refugees qualified for Indian passport also had the right to vote in Indian elections. The Election Commission wrote on February 7, 2014 to all states to enrol Tibetan refugees, born in India between the stipulated period, as voters, before the April-May 2014 General Elections. But a large section of Tibetans could not exercise their franchise as their documents could not be verified on time.
Another significant implication of the Delhi High Court judgement was with regard to job provisions for them in India. Citing the judgement, the Indian Nursing Council allowed Tibetan nurses born in India before July 1, 1987, to be registered with it so that they could practise their profession.
While little over one lakh Tibetan refugees live in India making India the largest host of Tibetans in exile, more than 35,000 Tibetans born between 1956 and 1987 now stand to qualify to be Indian citizens.

Indian citizenship and voting rights for Tibetans: A Complex Issue

The issue of Indian citizenship and voting rights for Tibetans is rather more complex and is involved in technicalities. In principle, neither the Indian government nor the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA or the Tibetan government in exile) appreciates such a move. Even the Election Commission acknowledges that the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs – the nodal ministry for the Citizenship Act – is “against giving voting rights to refugees in India…”
Reportedly, the China angle is quite significant for the government but Beijing had remained mum on both the Delhi and Karnataka high court rulings in the past.

Tibetans: No More Refugees Now?

Another question that is being raised now is: whether the Tibetans simultaneously enjoy both the status of refugees and citizens at the same time. But the status of Tibetans as refugees in India has been debatable since India is not a party to the 1951 United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees or its 1967 protocol. Besides India does not have any specific legislation about refugee rights and protection either. The Tibetans in India are provided a registration card under the Foreigners Act of 1946 and they are required to register themselves at a Foreigner Registration Office every year (in some cases, every five years) to extend their stay here.
As of now, the Tibetan government-in-exile issues each Tibetan a “Green Book, which is proof of their original nationality”. The CTA, though, leaves the decision to apply for Indian or any other country’s citizenship to the individuals and considers that to be a “personal choice”.
The Tibetan Prime Minister-in-exile Dr Lobsang Sangay, who incidentally is himself a US Green Cardholder, recently told an interviewer that the CTA “cannot compel” any Tibetan to apply for Indian citizenship “as the application process entails surrendering both Registration Certificate (RC) and Identity Certificate (IC) documents to the Indian authorities”.
The request for NOCs by India-born Tibetans though has thus far been very less as many still see voting in Indian elections as the dilution of the dream of a Free Tibet. Will this perception change now?
Given their insignificant numbers, Tibetans cannot emerge as a ‘vote bank’. Yet, as citizens, they may be able to buy land in their adopted country – a privilege that they could not enjoy as a foreign refugee.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

War between Arvind Kejriwal and Najeeb Jung

War between Arvind Kejriwal and Najeeb Jung By  Deepak Parvatiyar May 21, 2015 Rate this post The ongoing public spat between Lieutenant Governor Najeeb Jung and Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal over the control of Delhi administration has exposed the grey areas in governance that require immediate redressal to ensure against any such crisis in the city state of Delhi. The immediate provocation was the appointment of Shakuntala Gamlin as acting Chief Secretary of Delhi by the Lieutenant Governor in spite of Kejriwal’s strong opposition on 15th May this year. This made the Chief Minister cry foul alleging that the LG was “functioning as if there is President’s Rule in the national capital and there is no elected government here” by bypassing the “democratically elected government…(and) issuing instructions to officers”. Much drama unfolded ever since. Both Kejriwal and Jung indulged into public sparring with Kejriwal even dispatching an angry letter to Jun...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is this the End of Dynastic Politics in India?

Is this the End of Dynastic Politics in India? By  Deepak Parvatiyar July 30, 2014 Why are we so eager to write the epitaph of dynastic rule just because the Congress lost the elections this time? Didn’t the torch bearers of India’s foremost political dynasty – the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty, who contested the elections, actually won? Whether it was Sonia Gandhi, her son Rahul (both Congress), Maneka Gandhi and her son Varun (both BJP) all of them tasted victory at the hustings. Can Dynasties be Devoid of Conflicting Ideologies? I have another poser. It may be a wild assumption but suppose Varun rises in the BJP to become the prime minister of the country, would we call him carrying the legacy of a Nehru or a Gandhi? Would we make a distinction because of the ideological differences between Nehru’s centrist and Varun’s right wing politics? Yet there are instances in Indian politics where fathers (even mothers) and sons (and daughters alike) have nurtured poli...
Post a Comment
Read more

Expectations from Chinese President Xi Jinping’s India Visit

Expectations from Chinese President Xi Jinping’s India Visit By  Deepak Parvatiyar September 5, 2014 Much is expected of the ensuing India visit of the Chinese President Xi Jinping both on strategic and economic fronts. Indian Commerce Minister Nirmala Seetharaman visited Beijing at the same time when Prime Minister Narendra Modi was in Japan. India expects Jinping’s visit to pave the way for major Chinese investments in the country, while also hoping China to facilitate Indian IT services exports by removing the barriers. Border dispute between the two countries too are expected to figure in the summit meet. China High on India’s Agenda There is no doubt that China is crucial to the Modi government’s foreign policy. Vice President Hamid Ansari had visited Beijing in June this year (Seetharaman had accompanied Ansari to China then too). At that time both countries had signed a Memorandum of Understanding on facilitating Chinese industrial parks in India...
Post a Comment
Read more