Skip to main content

Tibetans : From Refugees to Voters

Tibetans : From Refugees to Voters

December 23, 2014
Tibetan refugees who were born in India between January 26, 1950 and July 1, 1987 now enjoy the right to vote for the ensuing Delhi Assembly elections as per a December 8 order of the Election Commission of India to Delhi’s Chief Electoral Officer. Other states too will soon follow the line once the electoral rolls are revised.
Tibetans From Refugees to Voters
The decision does not have the government’s consent but is legally valid as India’s citizenship law is very clear that the people born in India before July 1, 1987 and their children are citizens by birth.

Tibetans’ Right to Indian Citizenship Upheld by Courts

The issue of citizenship to Tibetan refugees though came into prominence following judgements on the issue of refugee status of Tibetans born in India between the stipulated period, in two separate yet identical cases respectively by the High Courts of Delhi in December 2010, and Karnataka in August 2013.  Both the High court rulings upheld the Tibetan petitioners’ right to an Indian passport as per the provisions under the country’s Citizenship Act, 1955.
The landmark judgments had much larger ramifications. They implied that the Tibetan refugees qualified for Indian passport also had the right to vote in Indian elections. The Election Commission wrote on February 7, 2014 to all states to enrol Tibetan refugees, born in India between the stipulated period, as voters, before the April-May 2014 General Elections. But a large section of Tibetans could not exercise their franchise as their documents could not be verified on time.
Another significant implication of the Delhi High Court judgement was with regard to job provisions for them in India. Citing the judgement, the Indian Nursing Council allowed Tibetan nurses born in India before July 1, 1987, to be registered with it so that they could practise their profession.
While little over one lakh Tibetan refugees live in India making India the largest host of Tibetans in exile, more than 35,000 Tibetans born between 1956 and 1987 now stand to qualify to be Indian citizens.

Indian citizenship and voting rights for Tibetans: A Complex Issue

The issue of Indian citizenship and voting rights for Tibetans is rather more complex and is involved in technicalities. In principle, neither the Indian government nor the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA or the Tibetan government in exile) appreciates such a move. Even the Election Commission acknowledges that the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs – the nodal ministry for the Citizenship Act – is “against giving voting rights to refugees in India…”
Reportedly, the China angle is quite significant for the government but Beijing had remained mum on both the Delhi and Karnataka high court rulings in the past.

Tibetans: No More Refugees Now?

Another question that is being raised now is: whether the Tibetans simultaneously enjoy both the status of refugees and citizens at the same time. But the status of Tibetans as refugees in India has been debatable since India is not a party to the 1951 United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees or its 1967 protocol. Besides India does not have any specific legislation about refugee rights and protection either. The Tibetans in India are provided a registration card under the Foreigners Act of 1946 and they are required to register themselves at a Foreigner Registration Office every year (in some cases, every five years) to extend their stay here.
As of now, the Tibetan government-in-exile issues each Tibetan a “Green Book, which is proof of their original nationality”. The CTA, though, leaves the decision to apply for Indian or any other country’s citizenship to the individuals and considers that to be a “personal choice”.
The Tibetan Prime Minister-in-exile Dr Lobsang Sangay, who incidentally is himself a US Green Cardholder, recently told an interviewer that the CTA “cannot compel” any Tibetan to apply for Indian citizenship “as the application process entails surrendering both Registration Certificate (RC) and Identity Certificate (IC) documents to the Indian authorities”.
The request for NOCs by India-born Tibetans though has thus far been very less as many still see voting in Indian elections as the dilution of the dream of a Free Tibet. Will this perception change now?
Given their insignificant numbers, Tibetans cannot emerge as a ‘vote bank’. Yet, as citizens, they may be able to buy land in their adopted country – a privilege that they could not enjoy as a foreign refugee.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WANTED: A Leader

WANTED: A Leader EDITORIAL NEWS Share on facebook Share on blogger Share on linkedin Share on twitter More Sharing Services 31 WANTED: A Leader June 13, 2012 12:15 PM By Deepak Parvatiyar Do we really have any leader in our country who is above religion, caste, and sectarian politics and yet popular with the masses? Can you name any one name that is acceptable to the majority as a mass leader? My question assumes significance in the wake of what we witnessed last week. First, at the Congress Working Committee meeting the delegates raked up the issue of inaccessible ministers (how can they be leaders if they are inaccessible?) Yet, the most important issue was the lack of unanimity even within the ruling coalition itself over the choice of the next Presidential candidate. Thereafter, the BJP’s Gujarat satrap Narendra Modi delivered a power packed punch to claim the scalp of his little-known-much-discussed and elusive bête noire Sanjay Joshi. (Can Modi ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why election manifestos are losing their value and importance in India?

Why election manifestos are losing their value and importance in India? By  Deepak Parvatiyar March 11, 2015 Much ruckus is being made on the coming together of the two diametrically opposite parties, the Jammu and Kashmir People’s Democratic Party and the  Bharatiya Janata Party , to form the government in Jammu and Kashmir. Inarguably they are two uncomfortable allies who in any given circumstances are considered ideologically misfit to join hands lest rule together. The initial jerks in the coalition have already surfaced after the J&K PDP’s mentor and new state chief minister Mufti Mohammed Sayeed arbitrarily decided to release hard-line Kashmiri separatist Masarat Alam from detention, recently. This has put the BJP in the dock and it now cries foul over not being consulted on the issue. The Opposition has even forced adjournments in both the houses of Parliament over the issue demanding an explanation from the BJP-led Union Government. The BJP is ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Summary of Second Phase of Assam and Bengal polls

Summary of Second Phase of Assam and Bengal polls By Deepak Parvatiyar http://www.elections.in/blog/summary-second-phase-assam-bengal-polls/ April 11, 2016 An FIR was filed against Assam Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi (Congress) under Section 126 of the Representation of People’s Act at the direction of the Election Commission for violating the model code of conduct by holding a press conference in Guwahati during the second phase of polling in the state. The allegations made by Gogoi during the press conference were found unfounded by the Commission which viewed the press conference as an exercise to influence the polling. Voter Turnout in Assam State polls in Assam concluded with 82.02% of 1,04,35,277 voters turning out at the 12,699 polling stations by 5 pm, to seal the fate of 525 candidates in 61 assembly constituencies of the state. The polling percentage was much higher than the 76.05% recorded in these constituencies in 2011 state elections and the 80.21% poll...
Post a Comment
Read more