Skip to main content

SAARC Summit: the Same Old Story

SAARC Summit: the Same Old Story

November 28, 2014
Ever since the first summit of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) was held in Dhaka, Bangladesh on 8th December 1985, SAARC has failed to live up to the high expectations that it had generated for a regional political and economical cooperation in South Asia.
SAARC Summit - Failed Expectations
The forum’s contribution has been dismal largely because of the tense Indo-Pak relationship in the region. Despite the free trade pact of 2006 between the eight member nations – India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and the Maldives – the member nations do hardly five percent of their total trade with each other!

The Kathmandu SAARC Summit: Low on Deliverance

The 18th SAARC meet in Kathmandu, held after a gap of three years, too was not much different in terms of deliverance and agreement as just one of the three issues tabled there could be reached because of Pakistan’s veto. (A consensus among the member countries is crucial for any resolution to be adopted at SAARC). Even the pact on energy cooperation and to create a regional electricity grid could be clinched at the very last moment. That proved to be a face saver for the summit.
The agreements on the other two issues – road connectivity and railways – could not materialise as Pakistan blocked them on grounds that its internal processes were not complete. This was despite the fact that Nepal, as chair, tried its best to convince Islamabad to sign the pacts that were initiated by India and were tabled through the SAARC secretariat.
Yet, facing political unrest at home as well as the American pressure to check Pakistan’s terror factories, the beleaguered Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif rather chose to deflect such issues by playing his anti-India card in a desperate bid to address his constituency back home.

Pakistan’s Anti-India Stance was too Evident

SAARC was yet another such platform for Islamabad to internationalise Kashmir after there were no takers for Sharif’s Kashmir rant at the United Nations General Assembly, where he got a befitting reply by his Indian counterpart, Narendra Modi, in September this year. He had further lost his face as Indian troops retaliated aggressively to Islamabad’s violation of ceasefire at LoC in Jammu & Kashmir. Just on the eve of the summit, the Pakistani Prime Minister was further snubbed by the US President Barack Obama when he sought his intervention on the Kashmir issue during his scheduled visit to New Delhi as chief guest for the Republic Day celebrations.
Sharif’s desperation was evident in Kathmandu too, where he tried to pit China against India by becoming a willing lobbyist for Beijing that wants to be a member of the SAARC. As a balancing act, he also named South Korea to be included as a member. (Both China and South Korea are among the eight countries and an inter-governmental organisation (the European Union) which are associated with SAARC as Observers)
This was a deft tactical shift by Pakistan. By bulldozing agreements on one hand, and by playing up China on the other, it did try corner India as it is well aware that the summit’s failures could boost prospects of China’s entry into the grouping. Beijing’s announcement to spend $30 billion for road building in South Asia over five years, and its suggestion to increase trade to $150 billion over this period, does seem a smart ploy to marginalise the influence of India in the grouping.
It may be recalled that in July 2012, China had influenced Cambodia, where it had invested heavily, to ensure that for the first time in its 45-year history, ASEAN’s foreign ministers failed to issue a joint communiqué because of an internal conflict particularly between the chair, Cambodia, and the Philippines, which had sought ASEAN’s support in its rejection of Chinese ‘creeping assertiveness’.
Indeed Pakistan tried to enact a Cambodia in Nepal and initially seemed successful in its ploy when Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa, Maldives President Abdulla Yameen Abdul Gayoom, and Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina too seemed inclined towards engaging observers for capacity building.

India Tried to Foil Pakistan’s Attempts to play Spoilsport

However, an alert India had already made its opposition to any horizontal expansion of SAARC in a SAARC foreign ministry-level meeting on 25th November and instead emphasised on strengthening the SAARC foundation. In course of the Summit, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, subtly pre-empted Pakistan’s attempts to play spoilsport by firmly emphasising on enhancing bilateral cooperation irrespective of the SAARC summit outcome — “we will move to enhance our bonds with South Asia together if we can, if not with those who are ready for it”.
The SAARC summit coincided with elections in Jammu & Kashmir and India had the additional challenge of thwarting any Pakistani bid to raise the ‘K’ word from its platform. Sharif’s ploy was ostensibly to instigate New Delhi. Just before leaving for the summit, his remarks that “Before dialogue with India, I have decided to engage with Kashmiri leaders,” was a calculated ploy to evoke sentiments in India.

India made Pakistan Isolated on Terror

Even as the Summit talks were on, Pakistani infiltrators were engaged in fierce gun battle in Jammu’s Arnia sector. In fact the Summit had opened on the anniversary of the 26/11 terror attacks in Mumbai. While India has been pressing Pakistan for a speedy trial of the 26/11 accused, Modi did raise the issue in his address and called for a pledge to combat terror and trans-national crimes. Sharif, on his part, refrained from speaking about terror.
Obviously the tension was palpable. Any ‘structured’ meeting between two South Asian leaders was not in the agenda. Both leaders ignored each other till the very last during the summit and shook hands only at the dying hours – a welcome move by Modi to acknowledge the effort of the chair, Nepal, which played the role of a peacemaker between the two.
Yet, the biggest success for India was to get Pakistan isolated in SAARC on the terror issue. While Afghan President Ashraf Ghani made a veiled reference to Pakistan as he spoke about the need to ensure that state actors did not embrace non state actors responsible for terrorism, the Bhutan PM Tshering Tobgay too raised the issue of terrorism.
Obviously, given his failure again – whether in his attempt to bulldoze SAARC, or to corner India – Sharif will be required to do a lot of explaining in Islamabad. He should be better prepared for that.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

War between Arvind Kejriwal and Najeeb Jung

War between Arvind Kejriwal and Najeeb Jung By  Deepak Parvatiyar May 21, 2015 Rate this post The ongoing public spat between Lieutenant Governor Najeeb Jung and Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal over the control of Delhi administration has exposed the grey areas in governance that require immediate redressal to ensure against any such crisis in the city state of Delhi. The immediate provocation was the appointment of Shakuntala Gamlin as acting Chief Secretary of Delhi by the Lieutenant Governor in spite of Kejriwal’s strong opposition on 15th May this year. This made the Chief Minister cry foul alleging that the LG was “functioning as if there is President’s Rule in the national capital and there is no elected government here” by bypassing the “democratically elected government…(and) issuing instructions to officers”. Much drama unfolded ever since. Both Kejriwal and Jung indulged into public sparring with Kejriwal even dispatching an angry letter to Jun...

Expectations from Chinese President Xi Jinping’s India Visit

Expectations from Chinese President Xi Jinping’s India Visit By  Deepak Parvatiyar September 5, 2014 Much is expected of the ensuing India visit of the Chinese President Xi Jinping both on strategic and economic fronts. Indian Commerce Minister Nirmala Seetharaman visited Beijing at the same time when Prime Minister Narendra Modi was in Japan. India expects Jinping’s visit to pave the way for major Chinese investments in the country, while also hoping China to facilitate Indian IT services exports by removing the barriers. Border dispute between the two countries too are expected to figure in the summit meet. China High on India’s Agenda There is no doubt that China is crucial to the Modi government’s foreign policy. Vice President Hamid Ansari had visited Beijing in June this year (Seetharaman had accompanied Ansari to China then too). At that time both countries had signed a Memorandum of Understanding on facilitating Chinese industrial parks in India...

The Legacy of a Callous Force

BOMBAY MUSINGS Corruption, Inefficiency... The Legacy of a Callous Force By Deepak Parvatiyar (in Bombay) (This column was published in Free Press Journal, Bombay on 8th March, 1993) If one ignores its dubious role during the recent riots, the Bombay police did enjoy a reputation which could make the famous Scotland Yard envy it. But the recent riots and the emergence of a corrupt and partisan police force made one wonder about such an hyped-up image of the city police. And as the chroniclers recorded the latest events for posterity as a blotch on the face of the city police, one was tempted to flip the pages of history to find out whether the city police ever bore a semblance to the other three Ps -- profiteering, puissance and pomposity -- which have unceremoniously remained a hallmark of Indian police. The modern police force in the city traces its origin to the Bhandari Militia, which had been established around 1672 mainly due to the efforts of the the...