Skip to main content

Vadra Land Deal Case : A hot election issue

Vadra Land Deal Case : A hot election issue

October 11, 2014
This is one such case that involves high and mighty – Congress Party President Sonia Gandhi’s son-in-law Robert Vadra!  His alleged involvement in controversial land deals in Haryana and Rajasthan had been a hotly discussed issue. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has ubiquitously termed it as ‘Damadgate’ a la ‘Watergate’. Narendra Modi, whenever in a campaign mode, has been quite acerbic in his remarks on this issue.
Vadra-dlf land deal caseImage Credits: Last Emperor
The immediate provocation for Modi to rake up the issue of Vadra land deals now once again at his elections rallies in Haryana which faces assembly elections on 15th October, was the report that the Congress government of Haryana had  cleared a land deal between Robert Vadra and real estate major DLF. Modi alleged the State Chief Minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda was “pressurised from the top (Congress leadership) to take such a decision,” and “hoped” the Election Commission “will take appropriate action for any violation of the Model Code of Conduct”.

The Vadra land deal case – A quick recap

It was on 5th October, 2012 that Arvind Kejriwal, who had just launched his Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), and his party colleague and Supreme Court lawyer Prashant Bhushan held a press conference and alleged that Vadra purchased at least 31 properties, mostly in New Delhi, worth over Rs 300 crore for which money came from “unsecured interest-free loans from DLF Ltd”. They alleged that the bulk of the properties purchased from real estate firm DLF were at a price far below the market rates. They charged that the deal could be a ‘quid pro quo’ for DLF as it had benefited to the tune of around 350 acres of land in the Congress-ruled Haryana. The DLF denied giving any such unsecured loan to Vadra and stated that it had given Rs 65 crore as “business advances”, out of which Rs 15 crore was fully refunded and Rs 50 crore was used for the purchase of land. However, soon the BJP too joined the issue and demanded a probe on grounds that why the DLF which itself had a loan to the tune of Rs 22,000 crore and paying an interest of 15 percent thereon was extending interest-free loans worth Rs 65 crore to Vadra.

Vadra Allegations: Strategy or Error on Modi’s Part?

Yet ultimately, it emerged that Modi’s claims were not backed up by facts. Since the state government decision was taken in July – much before the enforcement of the model code of conduct –  it was not a poll code violation and theElection Commission ruled so after taking formal cognizance of the Prime Minister’s allegations.
What does this imply? Was it a deliberate decision of the Prime Minister to seek electoral gains or was it a faux pass? A defiant BJP though now claims that  the Hooda government in Haryana did not furnish full facts about the land deal to the Election Commission. Expectedly, the Congress now demands an apology from the PM!
It may be mentioned that the Vadra’s land deal issue had emerged as a pet issue of the BJP and Modi had repeatedly raked it up in his election rallies in the run up to the last general elections too. Yet, he was not the PM then!
What Prevents PM Modi from Taking Action Against Vadra?
Apparently allegations of such nature and that too coming from the Prime Minister of all the persons have even confounded Modi’s most staunch supporters.  As one quipped on the Facebook – “There’s no point in making ‘damaad-ji’ jokes if you are PM of a country, have all the resources at your disposal, and are still not prosecuting the said ‘damaad-ji’. It only makes us wonder why you are doing nothing.”
Obviously why should one justify Modi playing to the gallery on an issue of such a serious nature? If he thinks Vadra is guilty then as the PM, he does have the means to take action and book the culprit.
Yet, wouldn’t any action against the family member of a political rival smack of a ‘political vendetta’? Indeed, such a prospect does loom large and needs a careful approach.

Vadra Land Deals : A Complicated Issue

As late as on 16th September this year, the Delhi High Court had rejected a Public Interest Litigation that sought a Central Bureau of Investigation probe into these Vadra deals under charges of cheating, forgery, criminal conspiracy and Prevention of Corruption Act.
It does seem there is much than what meets the eye in the Vadra land deals. He faces charges of indulging into dubious land deals in Haryana and Rajasthan. It all started when the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance government was at the helm in New Delhi and both Rajasthan and Haryana had Congress governments in the state. The BJP made it a big election issue in the Rajasthan assembly elections and the last general elections as well. It even released a booklet and a video titled ‘Damaadgate’, of Vadra’s illegally acquiring land and made serious allegations against Hooda -led Congress government in Haryana and the former Congress government in Rajasthan of violating the rules and also overlooking environmental aspects while allotting land to Vadra.
The particular case of Haryana came to light in 2012 when Khemka, the then Director General (Consolidation) of Haryana, cancelled the mutation of the 3.5 acres land sold by Vadra in 2008 to DLF on grounds that it violated the Consolidation Act of the states. While the state government questioned Khemka’s decision to scrap the deal without giving the affected parties a chance to give their version, it was though forced to order an investigation into the deal worth Rs 58 crore. The inquiry found Khemka’s decision to be “baseless” and the state government finally sanctioned the mutation in July this year.
The issue refuses to die ever since, at least during elections!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WANTED: A Leader

WANTED: A Leader EDITORIAL NEWS Share on facebook Share on blogger Share on linkedin Share on twitter More Sharing Services 31 WANTED: A Leader June 13, 2012 12:15 PM By Deepak Parvatiyar Do we really have any leader in our country who is above religion, caste, and sectarian politics and yet popular with the masses? Can you name any one name that is acceptable to the majority as a mass leader? My question assumes significance in the wake of what we witnessed last week. First, at the Congress Working Committee meeting the delegates raked up the issue of inaccessible ministers (how can they be leaders if they are inaccessible?) Yet, the most important issue was the lack of unanimity even within the ruling coalition itself over the choice of the next Presidential candidate. Thereafter, the BJP’s Gujarat satrap Narendra Modi delivered a power packed punch to claim the scalp of his little-known-much-discussed and elusive bête noire Sanjay Joshi. (Can Modi ...

Why election manifestos are losing their value and importance in India?

Why election manifestos are losing their value and importance in India? By  Deepak Parvatiyar March 11, 2015 Much ruckus is being made on the coming together of the two diametrically opposite parties, the Jammu and Kashmir People’s Democratic Party and the  Bharatiya Janata Party , to form the government in Jammu and Kashmir. Inarguably they are two uncomfortable allies who in any given circumstances are considered ideologically misfit to join hands lest rule together. The initial jerks in the coalition have already surfaced after the J&K PDP’s mentor and new state chief minister Mufti Mohammed Sayeed arbitrarily decided to release hard-line Kashmiri separatist Masarat Alam from detention, recently. This has put the BJP in the dock and it now cries foul over not being consulted on the issue. The Opposition has even forced adjournments in both the houses of Parliament over the issue demanding an explanation from the BJP-led Union Government. The BJP is ...

Summary of Second Phase of Assam and Bengal polls

Summary of Second Phase of Assam and Bengal polls By Deepak Parvatiyar http://www.elections.in/blog/summary-second-phase-assam-bengal-polls/ April 11, 2016 An FIR was filed against Assam Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi (Congress) under Section 126 of the Representation of People’s Act at the direction of the Election Commission for violating the model code of conduct by holding a press conference in Guwahati during the second phase of polling in the state. The allegations made by Gogoi during the press conference were found unfounded by the Commission which viewed the press conference as an exercise to influence the polling. Voter Turnout in Assam State polls in Assam concluded with 82.02% of 1,04,35,277 voters turning out at the 12,699 polling stations by 5 pm, to seal the fate of 525 candidates in 61 assembly constituencies of the state. The polling percentage was much higher than the 76.05% recorded in these constituencies in 2011 state elections and the 80.21% poll...