Skip to main content

BJP-HJC : Will they Fight Haryana Polls 2014 Together?

BJP-HJC : Will they Fight Haryana Polls 2014 Together?

August 22, 2014
Kuldeep Bishnoi is no stranger to the vagaries of opportunistic politics. Being son of the irrepressible late Bhajan Lal – whose name became synonymous with the Aaya Ram Gaya Ram politics in the country, he is well groomed in the tradition of expedient politics. The father-son duo had left the Congress to form their own political outfit – the Haryana Janhit Congress (HJC) in 2007. In 2009, they had a dose of their own medicine when five of the six newly elected legislators of the HJC dumped the party and joined the ruling Congress.
BJP-HJC alliance for 2014 assembly polls

The Uneasy BJP – HJC Association

Three years ago, the HJC had inked a pact with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) that in a state election, both the parties would contest 45 of the 90 seats each and that Bishnoi would be the Chief Minister if the coalition is able to form the government.
But the HJC even failed to open its account in the state in this summer’s general elections. The BJP’s splendid performance at the hustings, where it won seven of the 10 seats from Haryana in this year’s general elections, has revived the party’s prospects in the state where it registered a lead in 53 of the 90 assembly segments and saw a quantum jump in its share of votes to a commendable 34.6 per cent from a dismal 17.21 per cent in the 2009 general election.
Little surprise, therefore, that the BJP wants to rewrite its 2011 pact with the HJC. So, the question arises on the future of the BJP-HJC alliance in the state. Should the BJP go to the polls in Haryana all alone? Or should it get into some pact with the Indian National Lok Dal (INLD)? It is interesting to note that one of its major allies in neighbouring Punjab and Delhi, the Shiromani Akali Dal, has already made a pact with the INLD in Haryana for the ensuing elections. Does this indicate the possibility of any larger post poll alliance between the BJP, SAD and the INLD?

Haryana Elections – A Game of Musical Chairs for the BJP

Call it expediencies of electoral politics or a marriage of convenience, the saffron party, in successive elections, has tied knot, turn by turn, with almost all major players in state politics (barring the Congress, of course) in its desperation to be a force to reckon with in the Jat land. Hence, late Bansi Lal’s Haryana Vikas Party (HVP), Om Prakash Chautala’s INLD, Kuldeep Bishnoi’s HJC, even as they remained bitter rivals of each others, have all – at some point of time or other – partnered the BJP.
Given the fact that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was once in-charge of the state for the BJP, much pride is now attached for him personally as he has much stake here. Any BJP pre-election political manoeuvre needs to be seen in this light as Haryana goes to poll in about a month’s time. (The date is yet to be announced by the Election Commission).
Yet before we indulge into any hypothesis of BJP’s political alliance during the ensuing state assembly elections, just consider these facts:
  • In 1989, the BJP made electoral adjustments with the Janata Dal but lost both the Lok Sabha seats that it contested in Haryana. Yet, Janata Dal won six of the total 10 seats from the state while the Congress bagged the remaining four seats.
  • In 1991, the BJP contested all the ten parliamentary seats in the state and its candidates lost deposits in nine seats. In the state assembly elections too that year, the party contested 89 seats but won only two. This was perhaps the trigger point for the saffron brigade to look for crutches in the successive elections in the state.
  • In 1996, the BJP joined hands with Bansi Lal’s HVP and contested six Lok Sabha seats and one four. The alliance also contested the Assembly elections together and the BJP, piggybacking on Bansi Lal’s popularity, won 11 of the 25 seats that it contested. Lal’s HVP won 33 of the 65 seats that it contested. This was the first and only time that the BJP could join the government in Haryana – albeit as an alliance partner that played second fiddle to the HVP. Yet within two years, the coalition lost the popular support of the people by imposing prohibition and also by forcibly recovering power dues from the farmers.
  • In 1998, even as the coalition continued, both the BJP and the HVP won only one seat each while Devi Lal’s Haryana Lok Dal won four seats in the state in the Lok Sabha elections.
  • In 1999, the BJP severed its ties with the HVP and tied knots with Devi Lal’s son, Chautala who became the CM as the leader of the INLD. In the Lok Sabha elections the same year, the BJP-INLD combine bagged all the ten seats in the state.

Modi’s Concerns over Haryana Elections

It is interesting that Modi, as in charge of BJP’s Haryana affairs, was directly involved with the party’s pact with HVP and thereafter with INLD! Yet, the support to the INLD was a result of barter between Chautala and the BJP as the former’s four MPs had voted in favour of the Confidence vote of the Atal Behari Vajpayee-led National Democratic Alliance coalition in Parliament on condition that the BJP will withdraw support to Bansi Lal. It is noteworthy that even though the Vajpayee government fell in New Delhi, the BJP honoured its commitment and installed Chautala as the CM of Haryana.
The genesis of the present power play between the Lotus and HJP perhaps lies in the bitter experience of the BJP with the INLD in the year 2000. In the Assembly election that year, the BJP could win only six of the 29 seats that it contested while the INLD contested 62 seats and won 47 of them. In the 90-member house, it did not require the BJP yet the latter lent unconditional support to the INLD from outside. The gesture was never reciprocated by the INLD forcing the BJP to go all alone again in the 2005 Assembly elections. It contested all 90 seats but could win just two of them. Even the INLD fared poorly with just nine seats to its kitty then. The next decade, therefore, belonged to the Congress that ruled the state for two successive terms. In 2009 the BJP’s dismal run continued in the state politics and it could bag only four Assembly seats in the state.
The issue that the BJP needs to resolve is whether to prefer the consolidation of non-Jat votes under Bishnoi or opt for a formidable Jat like Chautala these elections in Haryana? Chautala has thus far ruled out any INLD-BJP coalition. But then isn’t it true that politics is the art of the possible?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maharashtra Assembly Polls 2014 : Implications of the End of Alliances

Maharashtra Assembly Polls 2014 : Implications of the End of Alliances By  Deepak Parvatiyar September 27, 2014 The time-tested political alliances — Shiv Sena-Bharatiya Janata Party, and the Indian National Congress-Nationalist Congress Party — collapsed like a pack of cards within a matter of hours in Maharashtra on Thursday, the 26th September. On the surface, the reasons seem common for both the break ups – each one of the alliance partners wanted to have a larger share of the pie and wanted to contest more seats than the other in the ensuing state assembly elections. Performances of Allies in 2009 Maharashtra Assembly Polls In the last assembly elections in 2009, the Congress had emerged as the largest party in the 272-member Maharashtra House by winning 82 of the 169 seats that it had contested. Its coalition partner, the NCP, had then won 62 of the 114 seats it had contested then then. You may also like to read Who will be the next Chief Mi...

Indian Elections: Hostage to Corrupt Politicians?

Indian Elections: Hostage to Corrupt Politicians By  Deepak Parvatiyar September 18, 2014 We often talk of corruption pervading the electoral system in our country. We rue the criminals entering politics as we point out that 13 cabinet ministers in the present Union government face various charges of corruption. Further, as many as 186 MPs got elected despite facing criminal charges. In desperation, we expect a messiah a la Anna Hazare to stem the rot. Yet, corrupt and criminal elements manage to win elections, because we, the voters, elect them, even though we are fed up with corruption and criminalisation of politics. Do People Patronise Corrupt Politicians? Given a choice, don’t we voters most of the time opt for a benevolent crook who we perceive as a smart go-getter? Don’t we loathe an idealist simply because (s)he tends to go “too much by the book”?   Ask the Reserve Bank of India Governor, Raghuram Rajan! While  delivering a speech at...

WANTED: A Leader

WANTED: A Leader EDITORIAL NEWS Share on facebook Share on blogger Share on linkedin Share on twitter More Sharing Services 31 WANTED: A Leader June 13, 2012 12:15 PM By Deepak Parvatiyar Do we really have any leader in our country who is above religion, caste, and sectarian politics and yet popular with the masses? Can you name any one name that is acceptable to the majority as a mass leader? My question assumes significance in the wake of what we witnessed last week. First, at the Congress Working Committee meeting the delegates raked up the issue of inaccessible ministers (how can they be leaders if they are inaccessible?) Yet, the most important issue was the lack of unanimity even within the ruling coalition itself over the choice of the next Presidential candidate. Thereafter, the BJP’s Gujarat satrap Narendra Modi delivered a power packed punch to claim the scalp of his little-known-much-discussed and elusive bête noire Sanjay Joshi. (Can Modi ...