Skip to main content

J&K and Jharkhand Polls : Encouraging Second Phase, Again

J&K and Jharkhand Polls : Encouraging Second Phase, Again

December 3, 2014
Boycott calls by Maoist insurgents in Jharkhand and encounter of three Pakistan supported terrorists in Kupwara in Jammu and Kashmir failed to deter the voters during the second phase of polling on 2 December, 2014 held in both the states.
Phase 2 J and K and Jharkhand Polls

Security arrangements and People’s Participation Contributed to Large Turnout in Phase 2

Elections did take place under the shadow of the gun in both the states.
Jharkhand was on Red alert during the second phase of polling. Its borders were sealed to prevent cross border movement of Maoists from Chhatisgarh (where just on the poll-eve, they ambushed and killed 14 CRPF personnel), West Bengal and Odisha, and as many as 260 companies of central paramilitary forces (CPMF), besides the police force, were deployed in the state.
Jharkhand witnessed 66.38 percent voter turnout in 20 of the 81 assembly seats (as against 59.46 percent in 2009),  while J&K saw over 71 percent voting in the second phase of the five-phase elections in the two strife-torn states.
The 18 of the 87 constituencies in J&K included nine segments from militancy-infested districts of the Jammu region, including Poonch and Reasi. (While Reasi recorded 80 percent polling, Poonch registered 78 percent voting).
Similarly in Jharkhand, the 20 constituencies that went to poll in the second phase were spread across seven Maoists-hit districts. Repolling was also held peacefully at one booth in Garhwa seat and two in Chhatarpur constituency after incidents of boycott in three polling booths in the first phase of voting on November 25.

Voters Defied Fear in Both the States of J & K and Jharkhand

While in J&K, the killing of a sarpanch by militants in Shopian district on the eve of the second phase of polling failed to disrupt high turnout of voters, in Jharkhand, people ignored the Maoists’ boycott call to voted enthusiastically in spite of the fact that the second phase of elections coincided with an annual event of the Maoists’ military wing.
Both the states, in the process, defied the fear of any terror attack and turned out to seal the fate of 223 and 175 candidates in Jharkhand and J&K respectively. It included 35 women candidates in Jharkhand and one in J&K – Sakina Ittoo, who was the lone woman minister in the National Conference-Congress coalition government in the state.

Future of Political Bigwigs at Stake in both J&K and Jharkhand

The electoral fortunes of several high-profile candidates are now sealed in the ballot box after the second phase of voting in both states. They include two former Jharkhand chief ministers – Arjun Munda and Madhu Koda, seven state ministers including three from Jharkhand and a former Kashmiri separatist leader.
Both Munda and Koda are candidates from mineral rich Kolhan division. While Munda is the BJP candidate from Kharsawan, Koda, who floated his own political outfit, contested from Manjhgaon. In 2009 Parliamentary elections, Koda was accused of having distributed 500 motorbikes and cash in Chaibasa parliamentary constituency to lure voters. Hence this time he was reportedly under the watch of Income Tax sleuths.
Other important candidates in the second phase from Jharkhand included Koda’s wife and sitting MLA Gita, who is contesting from Jagannathpur, and BJP national vice-president Raghubar Das, a former deputy chief minister in the state, and now a CM aspirant, from Jamshedpur (East).
In J&K, Handwara in north Kashmir’s Kupwara district has generated much interest following former separatist Sajad Gani Lone’s candidature from there.  In 2009, Lone had unsuccessfully contested Lok Sabha elections.
The fate of J&K deputy Speaker and Jammu & Kashmir People’s Democratic Party leader Sartaj Madni too was sealed in the ballot box. He is seeking third consecutive term from Devsar Assembly segment. The other prominent faces in the fray in the second phase were ministers Saifullah Mir (Kupwara), Chaudhary Mohammad Ramzan (Handwara) and Ittoo (Noorabad) – all National Conference, and Ajaz Ahmad Khan of the Congress from Gool Amas Assembly segment.
People Showed Preference for Ballot over Bullets
The high voter turnout in violence-hit Jharkhand and J&K shows the sustained preference of the people for ballot over bullets. Both had shown similar high percentage of voting in the last Assembly elections also, despite the successive boycott calls by insurgents who have always sought to disrupt the electoral process in both.
Unlike in Jharkhand – where the insurgents are home-bred naxals with their own political ambition (reports suggest despite giving a boycott call, the Maoists forced people to vote for a particular candidate), in J&K, it has been the Pak-sponsored terror groups who have always resorted to violence to disrupt elections.
Tuesday’s poll percentage in J&K, is higher than the figure of 61.04 per cent polling during the 2014 Lok Sabha polls and 68.79 per cent recorded during the 2008 Assembly elections.

Can High Turnout be construed as Defeat of Separatism?

The high turnout has buoyed the political climate in both the states, particularly in J&K, where the separatists are now finding excuses. Media reports quote separatist leader Mirwaiz Umar Farooq saying that the high turnout did not mean that the people had abandoned the “path of right to self-determination”. The National Conference leader and CM Omar Abdullah too warned that the high turnout of voters could not be construed to be the “defeat of separatism”.
Yet, it is obvious that the people in both the troubled state came out in large number ostensibly to vote for stability and change like in the first phase that had seen 61.92 per cent polling in Jharkhand and 71.28 per cent polling in J&K.
With three more phases of electioneering to go, it remains to be seen whether this trend of high voting continues in both the states despite the lurking shadow of the gun.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Can Politicians in India ever be Honest ?

Can Politicians in India ever be Honest ? By  Deepak Parvatiyar September 10, 2014 “Na Khaoonga, Na Khane Doonga,” Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently declared. Loosely translated, it meant the PM would not tolerate corruption at public offices and one of his cabinet ministers lauded his remarks saying it required “real guts” for the PM to make such public proclamations. Why can’t we have honest politicians? Consider a quote from Simon Cameron, who served as United States Secretary of War for Abraham Lincoln at the start of the American Civil War — “An honest politician is one who, when he is bought, will stay bought.” It does conceal less and reveals all! Role of Big Money and Lobbyists in Politics You may also like to read Politicians of India At this juncture I am reminded of American Gil Fulbright’s last year’s satirical crowdfunding campaign for his project, ‘The Honest Politician’, that sought to enable him contest for the Kentucky senate against

Karnataka Elections 2018 No political party has ever returned to power in Karnataka since 1983

Karnataka Elections 2018 No political party has ever returned to power in Karnataka since 1983 By Deepak Parvatiyar The Marathi translation of this article was published in leading Marathi daily Pudhari on 28 April 2018     The high voltage election campaigning by national leaders of both rival parties, the Bharatiya Janata Party and the Congress, signify the importance of Karnataka elections. In case the Congress retains the state after elections, it will be a great morale booster for its cadre. In such a case the Congress president Rahul Gandhi can look forward to the ensuing elections in Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Chhatisgarh – all BJP bastions, with a positive frame of mind. He could then hope for a revival of the party before the 2019 general elections. This would be important particularly after his continued dismal show in state elections including those in the North Eastern states of Meghalaya, Tripura and Nagaland, earlier this year. To his advantage, K

Waterman Rajendra Singh on his activities in Maharashtra

Published in Marathi Daily Pudhari on 9th January 2018 साक्षात्कार डॉ . राजेंद्र सिंह जलपुरुष नाम से विख्यात मैग्सेसे एवं स्टॉकहोल्म वाटर पुरुस्कार से सम्मानित डॉ. राजेंद्र सिंह एक अरसे से महाराष्ट्र में पानी की समस्या के निवारण के लिए काम कर रहे हैं. उनके कामों का क्या प्रभाव पड़ा है इस विषय पर वरिष्ठ पत्रकार दीपक पर्वतियार ने विस्तार से उनसे बातचीत की.   प्रश्न 1. महाराष्ट्र में आप काफी समय लगा रहे हैं . आपके कामों का क्या प्रभाव हो रहा ? उत्तर. महाराष्ट्र में हम पांच तरह के काम कर रहे हैं. एक तो जल साक्षरता का काम जिसमें मेरा बहुत समय लगता है. महाराष्ट्र इस देश में अकेला राज्य है जहां सरकार, समाज और एकेडेमिक और एडमिनिस्ट्रेटिव तथा सोशल एडमिनिस्ट्रेटिव लीडरशिप के लोगों ने मिलकर पूरे राज्य में जल साक्षरता का एक अभियान   शुरू करने का काम किया है. यसदा में उसका सेंटर है. योजना में बहुत अच्छी टीम काम कर रही है. मैं उनको मदद करता हूं. उनको समय देता हूं. दूसरा काम जलयुक्त शिवार का है. वहां कुछ जगह जलयुक्त शिवार में जहां - जहां कुछ ऑफिस से और सामाजिक कार्यकर्त